• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eagereyes

Visualization and Visual Communication

  • Explore
    • Starter Pack
    • Blog Calendar
    • Blogroll
    • eagereyesTV YouTube Videos
  • Practical
    • Basics
    • Pie Charts
    • Techniques
    • Book Reviews
    • Journalism
  • Academic
    • Speaking Mistakes
    • Acceptance Rates
    • Papers
    • Conference Reports
    • Lists of Influences
    • Criticism
    • Peer Review
  • Admin
    • About
    • Contact
    • License
A Smart Take on Election Maps

Robert Kosara / January 9, 2018

A Smart Take on Election Maps

When maps are used to display data, there is often a discrepancy between the data being shown, which almost never relates to area, and the area of the different parts of the map. This is particularly common in election maps. This new map of votes in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election cleverly combines geography and data in a clear and compelling way.

This map is another piece by xkcd‘s Randall Munroe (also author of Thing Explainer). It works well for a number of reasons.

  • It doesn’t distort our perception of the data by using color on area, which is determined by land surface rather than population or electoral votes.
  • It doesn’t distort geography, like cartograms
  • It uses symbols of people to show a set multiple (somewhat similar to ISOTYPE)
  • Its hand-drawn aesthetic is fun and non-intimidating

The style of this map is not entirely new. In fact, dot density maps have a long history but have fallen out of fashion over the last few decades (a colleague of mine blames GIS for this development). Here’s a nice example about agriculture – which you might imagine would be about area, but it’s not (from here).

Using fewer but larger symbols, it’s possible to make them recognizable. There’s a balance though between the size and the density that can be achieved. Munroe has done a great job in his map, showing just enough density so you can find some patterns, but not making the symbols too tiny. I also think he is trying to make a point with the single figures in Wyoming and the Dakotas (also Alaska and Hawaii).

It’s a great map, and perhaps the most effective one I’ve seen showing this data so far, given the United States’ vast area and enormous differences in population density.

Filed Under: Blog 2018

Robert Kosara is Data Visualization Developer at Observable. Before that, he was Research Scientist at Tableau Software (2012–2022) and Associate Professor of Computer Science (2005–2012). His research focus is the communication of data using visualization. In addition to blogging, Robert also runs and tweets. Read More…

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

More Blog 2018 Articles

  • New Vis Research Blog: Multiple Views
  • Tapestry 2018 Program, Call for Demos
  • IEEE VIS 2018, Part 3: New Approaches, Meet the Founders, Perception and Cognition
  • IEEE VIS 2018, Part 2: Time, Evaluation, Dashboards, The Future of VIS
  • IEEE VIS 2018, Part 1: VisComm, VisInPractice, BELIV, Best Papers

Recently Popular

  • Data: Continuous vs. Categorical
  • The Simple Way to Scrape an HTML Table: Google Docs
  • The US ZIPScribble Map
  • New, Improved Traveling Presidential Candidate Map
  • How The Rainbow Color Map Misleads
  • New video: Gauges for Data Visualization, The NY Times Election Needle, and Circular Bar Charts
  • Watch My Outlier Talk: This Should Have Been A Bar Chart!
  • Facebook
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe via Email

Footer

  • About
  • Contact
  • License

Copyright © 2006–2022 Robert Kosara · All original materials are available under CC-BY-SA

 

Loading Comments...