• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eagereyes

Visualization and Visual Communication

  • Explore
    • Starter Pack
    • Blog Calendar
    • Blogroll
    • eagereyesTV YouTube Videos
  • Practical
    • Basics
    • Pie Charts
    • Techniques
    • Book Reviews
    • Journalism
  • Academic
    • Speaking Mistakes
    • Acceptance Rates
    • Papers
    • Conference Reports
    • Lists of Influences
    • Criticism
    • Peer Review
  • Admin
    • About
    • Contact
    • License
Review: Munroe’s Thing Explainer and Pinker’s Sense of Style

Robert Kosara / December 1, 2015

Review: Munroe’s Thing Explainer and Pinker’s Sense of Style

Bad writing and the inability to explain in terms normal people can understand are the hallmarks of academic writing. Here are two books every academic should read and take to heart to be able to recognize bad prose and learn how to fix it.

Randall Munroe, Thing Explainer: Complicated Stuff in Simple Terms

Munroe is the guy behind the xkcd web comic. In Thing Explainer, he uses his signature style to explain machines and processes in simple drawings and words. He limits himself to the “ten hundred” most common words in English (the word “thousand” did not make the list) to do that. The explanations are by no means simplistic though, and the drawings are very clever and contain lots of little in-jokes.

The small vocabulary used means no jargon, no difficult or unusual words at all. But the beauty of Thing Explainer goes beyond that. Take a look at Up Goer Five and note how he describes the different parts of the rocket: not what they are, but what they do. So much bad academic writing describes things as what they are, but never explains what they are actually good for and why anybody should care.

Munroe has also created a clever little web app that will flag words not on the list of one thousand most common. That certainly isn’t a practical way to write, whether academic papers or blog postings. But it’s instructive to see just how many words you’d expect to be extremely common really are not.

simple-writer

Steven Pinker, The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person’s Guide to Writing in the 21st Century

Steven Pinker’s book The Sense of Style is not just a book about grammar and how to write well, but it’s actually written very well itself. Pinker’s writing is lively, witty, crystal clear, and simply a pleasure to read. Just reading a page or two is a great way to prime yourself before you sit down to write. It will improve your paper, book, or whatever you’re working on.

What does a psychologist know about grammar? Pinker is not just extremely smart and one of the world’s leading psychologists, but also the chair of the usage panel of The American Heritage Dictionary. This man knows his stuff. And it shows in every single rule he explains and myth he dispels.

And there are many myths and nonsensical rules (like, never start a sentence with and). About a third of the book is a long list of topics that he works through methodically. That part feels like a bit of a laundry list, but it also serves as a useful reference when deciding what to do or when settling an argument.

Pinker is very respectful, but he’s also clear in his criticism. While he keeps talking about Strunk and White in a referential tone, he also demolishes large parts of the nonsense that book is spreading (and points to some of the internal inconsistencies and errors it contains).

The Sense of Style is the book to replace Strunk and White. It’s high time, too. Pinker’s book is based on real research, a much better understanding of language, and the way language is used today (instead of 100 years ago).

Help End Bad Writing

The two books are very different, which makes them such a beautifully complementary pair. One explains grammar and good writing in great detail, the other puts it into practice in a fun and engaging way. Both are very insightful and can teach you a lot about what it means to communicate well.

Both also make great gifts. No academic can be offended to be given a book written by Steven Pinker, and no nerd(y academic) can object to a book from Mr. xkcd.

Filed Under: Blog 2015 Tagged With: Book Reviews

Robert Kosara is Data Visualization Developer at Observable. Before that, he was Research Scientist at Tableau Software (2012–2022) and Associate Professor of Computer Science (2005–2012). His research focus is the communication of data using visualization. In addition to blogging, Robert also runs and tweets. Read More…

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Ian Roberts (@Borgendorf) says

    December 2, 2015 at 7:21 am

    Thank you for this. I’ve been interested in Thing Explainer and I hadn’t heard about the other one. I’m writing more user help guides now and these both look useful.

    Reply
  2. Harold says

    April 4, 2016 at 3:04 am

    Thanks for the reviews.

    Did you mean he talks about Strunk and White in a reverential, rather than referential, tone?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

More Blog 2015 Articles

  • Ye Olde Pie Chart Debate
  • Memorability, Science, and The Value of Thinking Outside the Box
  • Tapestry 2016 Open For Applications
  • VIS Proceedings now in the January Issue of TVCG
  • VIS 2015 – Friday

Recently Popular

  • Midjourney is a Trip
  • Data: Continuous vs. Categorical
  • How The Rainbow Color Map Misleads
  • The Simple Way to Scrape an HTML Table: Google Docs
  • An Illustrated Tour of the Pie Chart Study Results
  • Spreadsheet Thinking vs. Database Thinking
  • You Only See Colors You Can Name
  • Facebook
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe via Email

Footer

  • About
  • Contact
  • License

Copyright © 2006–2022 Robert Kosara · All original materials are available under CC-BY-SA

 

Loading Comments...