• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

eagereyes

Visualization and Visual Communication

  • Explore
    • Starter Pack
    • Blog Calendar
    • Blogroll
    • eagereyesTV YouTube Videos
  • Practical
    • Basics
    • Pie Charts
    • Techniques
    • Book Reviews
    • Journalism
  • Academic
    • Speaking Mistakes
    • Acceptance Rates
    • Papers
    • Conference Reports
    • Lists of Influences
    • Criticism
    • Peer Review
  • Admin
    • About
    • Contact
    • License

Robert Kosara / December 5, 2012

All Responses to Gelman and Unwin in One Convenient Posting

After posting my response to Gelman and Unwin’s article on visualization and statistical graphics recently, I have now collected links to all the three other responses as well: Stephen Few, Paul Murrell, and Hadley Wickham.

Here is the complete set, including the original article, my response, and the rejoinder (which I had already posted):

  • Andrew Gelman and Anthony Unwin, Infovis and Statistical Graphics: Different Goals, Different Looks (original article, PDF)
  • Responses (in alphabetic order):
    • Stephen Few, Are Infovis and Statistical Graphics Really All That Different?
    • Robert Kosara, InfoVis Is So Much More: A Comment on Gelman and Unwin and an Invitation to Consider the Opportunities
    • Paul Murrell, Comment
    • Hadley Wickham, Graphical criticism: some historical notes
  • Andrew Gelman and Anthony Unwin, Tradeoffs in Information Graphics (rejoinder, PDF)

They are all interesting in their own way. Stephen Few goes through the many misconceptions very methodically and responds with thoughtful discussion and counterexamples, Paul Murrell lays out the principles of statistical graphics and asks the infovis community to pay more attention, and Hadley Wickham gives a nice historical perspective.

There is a lot of opportunity here not just to learn from what is being said, assumed, misunderstood, and explained, but also to pick up the many opportunities for collaboration between the fields. It’s baffling, quite frankly, that there are only a handful of people who know and understand both communities, when they share so many ideas, principles, and goals.

Filed Under: Blog 2012 Tagged With: paper, self-promotion

Robert Kosara is Data Visualization Developer at Observable. Before that, he was Research Scientist at Tableau Software (2012–2022) and Associate Professor of Computer Science (2005–2012). His research focus is the communication of data using visualization. In addition to blogging, Robert also runs and tweets. Read More…

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Hadley says

    December 6, 2012 at 5:34 pm

    Thanks for doing this Robert!

    Reply
  2. dianakornbrot says

    March 10, 2013 at 1:51 am

    How can there be any serious consideration of statistical graphics that ignores Rosling and gapminder?

    Infovis is mostly ‘fluff’ and does not seem to have any scatter plot options up front.

    http://www.gapminder.org/

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

More Blog 2012 Articles

  • New eagereyesTV Video and Series: Chart Appreciation
  • Four Values Can Still Be Worth A Chart
  • Tapestry, The Conference About Storytelling With Data
  • Listen To Me Dispense My Wisdom on the Data Stories Podcast!
  • A Scholarly Discussion with Andrew Gelman and Anthony Unwin

Recently Popular

  • Midjourney is a Trip
  • Data: Continuous vs. Categorical
  • The Simple Way to Scrape an HTML Table: Google Docs
  • Stacked Bars Are the Worst
  • How The Rainbow Color Map Misleads
  • Spreadsheet Thinking vs. Database Thinking
  • An Illustrated Tour of the Pie Chart Study Results
  • Facebook
  • GitHub
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Subscribe via Email

Footer

  • About
  • Contact
  • License

Copyright © 2006–2022 Robert Kosara · All original materials are available under CC-BY-SA