Submitted by Ayush (not verified) on Fri, 2007-11-02 01:07.
A very interesting read indeed. Its great to see so many folks thinking about this. Here is my perspective on what's wrong with Swivel.
To allow wider participation, adoption and prorogation a spirit of openness would be required. Standards can work wonders. If only one of these players would put a stake in the ground and create a standard for data and its visualization. The standard could minimally define an XML Schema for storing numerical data, a common set of APIs for storage, retrieval and update of data along with a standard approach which allows third party developers to build visualizations which can be plugged into any of these sites.
Re: Review: Swivel vs. Many Eyes
A very interesting read indeed. Its great to see so many folks thinking about this. Here is my perspective on what's wrong with Swivel.
To allow wider participation, adoption and prorogation a spirit of openness would be required. Standards can work wonders. If only one of these players would put a stake in the ground and create a standard for data and its visualization. The standard could minimally define an XML Schema for storing numerical data, a common set of APIs for storage, retrieval and update of data along with a standard approach which allows third party developers to build visualizations which can be plugged into any of these sites.